The United States Environmental Protection Agency building is seen in August 2024 in Washington, D.C. The Trump administration is shutting down the agency’s unit for scientific research.
Tierney L. Cross/Getty Images
hide caption
toggle caption
Tierney L. Cross/Getty Images
The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to shutter the agency’s scientific research arm that provides expertise for environmental policies and regulations, as part of the Trump administration’s continuing downsizing of the federal government.
The agency is closing the Office of Research and Development, which analyzes dangers posed by a variety of hazards, including toxic chemicals, climate change, smog, wildfires, indoor air contaminants, water pollution, watershed destruction and drinking water pollutants. The office also manages grant programs that fund universities and private companies.
“Under President Trump’s leadership, EPA has taken a close look at our operations to ensure the agency is better equipped than ever to deliver on our core mission of protecting human health and the environment while powering the great American comeback,” said EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin in a statement announcing the plan Friday. “This reduction in force will ensure we can better fulfill that mission while being responsible stewards of your hard-earned tax dollars.”
The cut, part of a plan to cut 23% of the EPA’s staff, will save $748.8 million, according to the agency. It said the EPA would at the same time add “laboratory functions and hundreds of scientific, technical, bioinformatic, and information technology experts to EPA’s air, water, and chemical offices on top of the thousands of scientists and engineers employed by EPA within those program offices.”
In addition, the agency is moving ahead with a plan to create a new “Office of Applied Science and Environmental Solutions,” the EPA says. That new office “will allow EPA to prioritize research and science more than ever before and put it at the forefront of rulemakings and technical assistance to states,” according to the agency.
Democratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the ranking member on the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee, condemned the cuts.
“Administrator Zeldin has finally confirmed what he has denied for months and months — the destruction of the Office of Research and Development,” she said in a statement. “The Trump Administration is firing hardworking scientists while employing political appointees whose job it is to lie incessantly to Congress and to the American people. The obliteration of ORD will have generational impacts on Americans’ health and safety. This is a travesty.”
Kyla Bennett, director of science policy for the nonprofit Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), said eliminating the ORD “will not only cripple EPA’s ability to do its own research, but also to apply the research of other scientists. This [reduction in force], together with the slashing of travel and training budgets, will leave EPA flying blind and unable to use the best available science. These short-sighted cuts will ultimately affect every American, and it is despicable.”
The American Chemistry Council, which represents chemical manufacturers, said the organization “supports EPA evaluating its resources to ensure American taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently and effectively to meet the Agency’s statutory requirements. If necessary, that includes shifting resources from certain offices.”
In January, the agency had 16,155 employees, but has reduced that number to 12,448, the EPA says. The agency has also eliminated the EPA’s Environmental Justice and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion arms among other cuts.
